-
XLP charges a much lower expense ratio and manages far more assets than RSPS.
-
Both funds have earned similar total returns, but XLP features deeper concentration in mega-cap staples leaders.
-
RSPS’s equal-weight approach could appeal to those seeking less exposure to sector giants.
-
These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires ›
The State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEMKT:XLP) stands out for its low cost and larger assets under management (AUM), while the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (NYSEMKT:RSPS) offers broader exposure to mid-tier staples stocks via equal weighting.
Both XLP and RSPS target the U.S. consumer defensive sector, but XLP tracks the sector’s largest names with a market-cap-weighted approach, whereas RSPS gives each constituent an equal footing. This comparison highlights differences in cost, performance, risk, and portfolio structure to help investors determine which style best fits their goals.
|
Metric
|
RSPS
|
XLP
|
|
Issuer
|
Invesco
|
SPDR
|
|
Expense ratio
|
0.40%
|
0.08%
|
|
1-yr return (as of Dec. 14, 2025)
|
-5.05%
|
-3.19%
|
|
Dividend yield
|
2.75%
|
2.67%
|
|
Beta (5Y monthly)
|
0.52
|
0.50
|
|
AUM
|
$236.2 million
|
$15.5 billion
|
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
XLP is considerably more affordable on fees, with a much lower expense ratio than RSPS. Dividend yields are roughly the same, so the cost difference is the main factor for investors comparing ongoing fees.
|
Metric
|
RSPS
|
XLP
|
|
Max drawdown (5 y)
|
-18.61%
|
-16.32%
|
|
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years
|
$992
|
$1,180
|
XLP holds 36 stocks covering the entire U.S. consumer defensive sector, but its market-cap-weighted design results in heavy exposure to giants like Walmart, Costco Wholesale, and Procter & Gamble. The fund has a long track record of 27 years, and its top three holdings alone comprise nearly 30% of assets, making it a focused play on established industry leaders.
RSPS, by contrast, equal-weights its 37 holdings, providing more balanced exposure across the consumer staples space. Its top positions — Dollar Tree, Dollar General, and The Estee Lauder Companies — each represent less than 4% of assets. Both funds are 100% consumer defensive, but RSPS’s approach reduces single-stock concentration and may appeal to investors seeking diversification beyond the sector’s largest names.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
Both XLP and RSPS are highly targeted ETFs focused on a relatively niche sector of the market, but they differ primarily in their diversification and portfolio allocations.
While the two funds contain roughly the same number of stocks, XLP is more tilted toward its top holdings. The top three stocks alone make up 28.61% of the entire fund, compared to 9.48% with RSPS’s top three holdings.
XLP’s strategy can be both an asset and a risk. When its top holdings are performing well, this ETF can see higher-than-average returns. But if those stocks stumble, it can quickly derail the fund’s overall earnings.
RSPS’s more diversified approach offers a different set of advantages and disadvantages. With less of a focus on its top holdings, RSPS is more protected against volatility. But there’s also a chance that high performers will be diluted by lower-performing stocks, shrinking this ETF’s earning potential.
Fees and flexibility are other factors investors may want to consider before buying. XLP boasts a much lower expense ratio of 0.08% compared to RSPS’s 0.40%, meaning investors can expect to pay $8 or $40 per year, respectively, in fees for every $10,000 invested. For long-term investors, those fees can add up over time.
XLP is also the larger of the two funds, with a significantly higher AUM. This can provide greater liquidity and make it easier to buy and sell, which can be an advantage for some investors seeking greater flexibility.
Expense ratio: The annual fee a fund charges investors, expressed as a percentage of assets under management.
Assets under management (AUM): The total market value of assets a fund manages on behalf of investors.
Market-cap-weighted: An index or fund strategy where each holding’s size is based on its total market value.
Equal-weighted: A portfolio strategy where each holding has the same weight, regardless of company size.
Dividend yield: The annual dividend income from an investment, shown as a percentage of its current price.
Beta: A measure of a security’s volatility compared to the overall market, typically the S&P 500.
Max drawdown: The largest observed percentage drop from a fund’s peak value to its lowest point over a period.
Consumer defensive sector: Industry segment focused on products essential for everyday living, like food, beverages, and household goods.
Concentration: The degree to which a portfolio is invested in a small number of holdings or sectors.
Total return: The investment’s price change plus all dividends and distributions, assuming those payouts are reinvested.
Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you’ll want to hear this.
On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a “Double Down” stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you’re worried you’ve already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it’s too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:
-
Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you’d have $453,954!*
-
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $52,940!*
-
Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $513,353!*
Right now, we’re issuing “Double Down” alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.
See the 3 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of December 8, 2025
Katie Brockman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Costco Wholesale and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Looking for a Consumer Staples ETF? Here’s How XLP and RSPS Compare on Cost, Risk, and Earnings was originally published by The Motley Fool
