-
VCLT charges a lower expense ratio and offers a higher dividend yield than LQD
-
VCLT’s long-duration bond focus means greater risk and deeper drawdowns compared to LQD
-
LQD holds a much broader set of bonds, while VCLT tilts toward financial and healthcare sectors
-
These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires ›
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) looks more affordable and offers a higher payout than iShares iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD), but comes with greater risk and a narrower portfolio.
Both LQD and VCLT target investment-grade U.S. corporate bonds, but they differ in maturity profiles, sector tilts, and risk. LQD is the go-to for broad exposure and liquidity, while VCLT may appeal to those seeking higher income and can tolerate bigger price swings in long-term bonds.
|
Metric
|
LQD
|
VCLT
|
|
Issuer
|
IShares
|
Vanguard
|
|
Expense ratio
|
0.14%
|
0.03%
|
|
1-yr return (as of 2025-12-12)
|
5.38%
|
3.51%
|
|
Dividend yield
|
4.34%
|
5.38%
|
|
Beta
|
1.40
|
2.01
|
|
AUM
|
$33.17 billion
|
$9.0 billion
|
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
VCLT is more affordable with a notably lower expense ratio, and it currently pays a higher dividend yield compared to LQD.
|
Metric
|
LQD
|
VCLT
|
|
Max drawdown (5 y)
|
-24.95%
|
-34.32%
|
|
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years
|
$808
|
$690
|
VCLT holds 2400 bonds, with a focus on long-term investment-grade corporate debt—primarily maturing in 10 to 25 years. Its biggest sector exposures are healthcare (14%) and financial services (13%). Top holdings include CVS Health (NYSE:CVS), The Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE:GS), and Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META). The fund has over 16 years of track record.
LQD offers much broader diversification, holding over 3,000 bonds. Its sector allocation is 100% Cash & Others, with notable positions including Blk Csh Fnd Treasury Sl Agency, Anheuser-busch Companies Llc, and Usd Cash. LQD tracks a mainstream investment-grade index.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
At first glance, the iShares iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and the Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF appear to serve the same role where both ETFs provide exposure to investment-grade U.S. corporate debt. The meaningful difference is not credit quality, but interest rate risk. LQD is structured as a broad and liquid core holding, while VCLT concentrates exposure much further out on the yield curve, which materially changes how each fund responds when interest rates fluctuate.
LQD holds thousands of bonds across a wide range of maturities, resulting in a shorter duration and more restrained price fluctuations. That design has made it a common benchmark for investment-grade corporate exposure and a frequent choice for investors prioritizing stability and liquidity. On the other hand, VCLT focuses on corporate bonds with longer maturities. This gives the ETF a significantly higher duration and greater sensitivity to long-term rate changes. Its higher yield reflects compensation for that added rate exposure rather than a meaningful shift in underlying credit risk.
For investors, the real question is whether they want stability or are willing to accept bigger swings for higher income. LQD is typically used as a core corporate bond allocation intended to provide steady income and moderate volatility. VCLT, by contrast, carries much heavier duration exposure and can magnify gains or losses as long-term yields move. The choice ultimately comes down to comfort: LQD is designed to steady a portfolio, while VCLT asks investors to accept sharper swings in exchange for higher income when rates move in their favor.
Expense ratio: The annual fee, as a percentage of assets, that a fund charges to cover its operating costs.
Dividend yield: Annual income from dividends as a percentage of the fund’s current price.
Drawdown: The percentage decline from a fund’s peak value to its lowest point over a period.
Beta: A measure of a fund’s volatility compared to the overall market, typically the S&P 500.
AUM (Assets Under Management): The total market value of assets that a fund manages on behalf of investors.
ESG screen: A process that includes or excludes investments based on environmental, social, and governance criteria.
Investment-grade: Bonds rated as relatively low risk of default by credit rating agencies.
Sector exposure: The proportion of a fund’s assets invested in specific industries or sectors.
Liquidity: How easily an asset or fund can be bought or sold without affecting its price.
Maturity profile: The range of times until the bonds in a fund reach their repayment dates.
Diversification: Spreading investments across various assets to reduce risk.
Total return: The investment’s price change plus all dividends and distributions, assuming those payouts are reinvested.
Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you’ll want to hear this.
On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a “Double Down” stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you’re worried you’ve already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it’s too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:
-
Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you’d have $489,202!*
-
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $52,090!*
-
Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $504,994!*
Right now, we’re issuing “Double Down” alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.
See the 3 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of December 22, 2025
Eric Trie has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
LQD vs VCLT: Stability or Income Opportunity was originally published by The Motley Fool
