[ccpw id="5"]

Home.forex news reportVanguard's VBK vs. Invesco's RZG

Vanguard’s VBK vs. Invesco’s RZG

-


  • The Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF offers a much lower expense ratio and larger assets under management than Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF.

  • RZG edges out VBK on one-year total return but both showed nearly identical drawdowns and long-term growth.

  • VBK holds far more stocks and leans toward technology, while RZG has a heavier healthcare tilt.

  • These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires ›

The Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (NYSEMKT:VBK) stands out for its ultra-low costs, deep liquidity, and broader diversification, while the Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF (NYSEMKT:RZG) delivers a marginally higher recent return and a more concentrated portfolio with a healthcare emphasis.

Both RZG and VBK aim to capture U.S. small-cap growth stocks, but they take distinct approaches in portfolio construction, sector exposure, and fees. This comparison breaks down how the two funds stack up on cost, performance, risk, portfolio makeup, and practical considerations for investors seeking small-cap growth exposure.

Metric

RZG

VBK

Issuer

Invesco

Vanguard

Expense ratio

0.35%

0.07%

1-yr return (as of 2026-01-09)

15.9%

14.4%

Dividend yield

0.4%

0.5%

AUM

$108.6 million

$39.7 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

VBK is markedly more affordable with a 0.07% expense ratio compared to RZG’s 0.35%, and it pays a slightly higher dividend yield. The fee gap favors VBK for cost-conscious investors, while the marginally higher yield may also appeal to those seeking a small income boost.

Metric

RZG

VBK

Max drawdown (5 y)

-38.31%

-38.39%

Growth of $1,000 over 5 years

$1,154

$1,145

VBK tracks a broad index of U.S. small-cap growth companies and currently holds 579 stocks, with a sector tilt toward technology (27%), industrials (21%), and healthcare (18%). Its largest single positions include Insmed Inc. (NASDAQ:INSM) at 1.44%, Comfort Systems USA Inc. (NYSE:FIX) at 1.13%, and SoFi Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:SOFI) at 1.11% of assets. The fund’s 22-year track record and diversified holdings may help reduce idiosyncratic risk compared to more concentrated strategies.

RZG, by contrast, is built around the S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Index, with a sharper focus on healthcare (26%), followed by industrials (18%) and financial services (16%). Its top holdings — ACM Research Inc. (NASDAQ:ACMR), PTC Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ:PTCT), and Progyny Inc. (NASDAQ:PGNY) — each represents a slightly larger slice of the portfolio than VBK’s top names. With 131 stocks, RZG is less diversified and may be more sensitive to swings in its favored sectors.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

LATEST POSTS

After Two Years Without Banks, Australian Traders Can Move Fiat on Binance Again

Blueberry Broker Review 2026: Regulation, Platforms, Fees & Trading Conditions | Finance Magnates ...

19-year-old grocery brand partner files Chapter 11 bankruptcy

Most people, myself included, don't really think about who makes the packaged goods on their grocery store shelves. The...

High Yield vs. Dividend Growth ETF Showdown

The ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is a classic dividend growth strategy. The Schwab...

Mauritius CFD Broker Frontbroker Integrates cTrader Across Client Accounts

Blueberry Broker Review 2026: Regulation, Platforms, Fees & Trading Conditions | Finance Magnates ...

Follow us

0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Most Popular

spot_img