[ccpw id="5"]

Home.forex news reportArizona man sold two homes for $744K — then lost in court...

Arizona man sold two homes for $744K — then lost in court and owed taxes on $255K. What every seller must know

-


Selling a home can come with one of the most generous tax breaks in the U.S. tax code — but a recent Tax Court ruling is a sharp reminder that this isn’t true in every situation.

In Pesarik v. Commissioner, a real-estate manager sold two properties in 2020 for a combined $743,800 (1) — properties he’d originally paid $424,750 for, and on which he believed he owed no tax gains, according to a Wall Street Journal story.

Tax Court Chief Judge Patrick Urda ruled otherwise: Jeffrey Pesarik owed taxes on $255,281 of unreported income, plus penalty and interest charges. He had failed to prove one home qualified as his principal residence, and also didn’t substantiate much of the claimed improvement basis of the other.

The case shows what can happen when sellers assume they qualify for tax breaks they haven’t actually earned or documented.

Many sellers “assume the IRS won’t ask questions,” CPA Eric Bronnenkant of Edelman Financial Engines told the Wall Street Journal (2).

The home-sale exclusion under Section 121 of the tax code lets qualifying sellers exclude up to $250,000 of profit from a home sale if filing single, or up to $500,000 for married couples filing jointly. It’s a significant break, but it comes with strict conditions (3).

According to the IRS, to qualify, you must have owned and lived in the home as your primary residence for at least two of the five years immediately before the sale. You can only claim it once every two years. If you own more than one home, the IRS specifies the exclusion applies only to your main residence — not a vacation home, rental, or investment property (4).

While Pesarik satisfied the ownership timeline on his Massachusetts home, the problem was proving it was actually his main home.

The judge noted he had no Massachusetts tax filings or in-state driver’s license, and his credit card bills went to a P.O. box in New Hampshire. The driver’s license he used for ID was from Arizona. Utility usage didn’t establish consistent Massachusetts residency. So, the court denied the exclusion, costing him a taxable gain of over $137,000 on that property alone (2).



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

LATEST POSTS

Samsung Targets SK Hynix AI Lead With $73 Billion Blitz

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is ramping up its chip ambitions with aggressive spending and new technology pushes to compete more directly...

Here’s what to do now

I plead guilty to understatement. These are unsettled times. For everyone fighting in and around the Persian Gulf. For...

Atlas Energy Stock Jumps 39% YTD, but One Fund Cut Exposure by $15 Million Last Quarter

On February 17, 2026, Meridian Wealth Advisors disclosed a reduction in its Atlas Energy Solutions (NYSE:AESI) position, selling 1,458,193 shares for...

Why did Straja of Hormuz mine reports matter #world

Answer string: "" Source link

Follow us

0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Most Popular

spot_img